Our Critics

Reply to Our Critics

Ratte for reading and criticizing our book. Interestingly, their three sets of comments (to which we shall respond in order) reflect three very different standpoints on both vision and the science of vision. 1. Reply to Tim Schroeder Tim Schroeder is a very sympathetic reader indeed. He raises two queries, both of which are well taken and go deep to the heart of our framework. His first questio...

Replies to our Critics

We are grateful to José Bermúdez and to Andrea Cristiano Pierno, Caterina Ansuini and Umberto Castiello for reading and criticizing our book. They offer us an opportunity to clarify some of our views. Bermúdez discusses aspects of our version of the two-visual systems model of human vision bearing on the separation between the content of visuomotor representations and the content of visual perc...

Response to our critics.

Health Economics, Policy and Law / FirstView Article / January 2015, pp 1 9 DOI: 10.1017/S1744133114000590, Published online: 30 January 2015 Link to this article: http://journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S1744133114000590 How to cite this article: Alex Voorhoeve, Trygve Ottersen and Ole Fritjof Norheim Response to our critics. Health Economics, Policy and Law, Available on CJO 2015 doi:10.1017/S...

Rape and Evolution: A Reply to Our Critics

Our critics might have valid concerns: Reducing our propensity to conflate.